Just a few weeks ago, I attended a day with Mike Schmoker. His ideas
caused quite a controversy in the room, after which he left to catch his plane
back home. The discussions that followed were most interesting. In summary (and
please feel free to add to this if you were there) he stated that reading and
writing were the goals and that all the projects we throw at our students are
quite often a waste of time. He confirmed a few things that I have observed and
quite admittedly become frustrated with in my own classroom. When students are
working on a project I assign, a few have managed to create a plan, have a list
of questions to guide their research and have sources that will support or
contradict their hypotheses. And let’s be honest, this description is very much
an exception and not the rule. Most students will fool around, unless I am
standing directly over them, and even then have no idea what to do despite a
co-created list of criteria and expectations.
When I grade the project, I barely even glance at the product. The grade
is based on my observations and most importantly on the process paper I require
as the proof of their learning, which is often devoid of real learning and sources.
So when Schmoker stated it (reading and writing) was what we should focus on, I
was not appalled like most of the room. What I have noticed, however, is that
the papers I have gotten this year (one grade younger than I am accustomed to)
are beyond pathetic. This is not to criticize my students, but to bring into
question the way I teach them how to research.
Because I have been blessed with the occasional fluke, I have begun to
believe that most of my greatest “ideas” are a result of accidents. This week,
because I have reached the end of my rope and I have moved into survival mode,
I stumbled upon something and I think it may be the start of something for me.
In my Social Studies class, I assigned a photo presentation. I asked the
students to choose countries (aside from North America) and to identify things
they do that are different from what they know from living in Canada. They
collected a number of photos from the internet – no words allowed except for a
title (with a flagrant lack of respect for copyright etc), but let’s focus on
the important part here.
I think that assigning something (with a project) in order to get them
to do research, is putting the cart before the ox. (Does this expression
work in English?) We need to create the curiosity to teach them how to ask
questions first. We need to have these discussions to get them thinking beyond
their four walls and to open their minds to the worlds which exist elsewhere on
the planet. I don’t have the answer about the whole how-to, but these little
discoveries (mostly by accident) have certainly gotten me to think about
research in a whole different way.
The discussions which occurred in my classroom this week will certainly
change the way I encourage students to find inspiration for their research. The
project has become the least important part of it, but this is not to say that
it has no value. I have begun to wonder if I should use it as an enrichment for
those who are ready and willing to create something new – beyond the reading,
writing, discussing and listening phase… The great part about this is that it
is not limited to the strongest kids. A student who is not at that point in
September, inspired by those who launch themselves into these projects may join
in later in the year. The quality and authenticity of their work will be
improved because it is truly theirs – at their pace and guided by their
questions and ideas – even though it might not start out that way.
This piece is in response to an article forwarded to me by Syd Korsunsky.